Housing supply is a growing crisis in the U.S., and both Republicans and Democrats have different approaches to solving it. While both parties agree that housing availability must be expanded, the way they intend to fund these initiatives reflects their broader economic philosophies. Republicans focus on deregulation and private sector investment, while Democrats propose direct federal spending, funded by higher taxes on corporations and high-income earners. However, these Democratic proposals could have a significant impact on the national debt.
Send your friends to: www.PoliticsInRealEstate.com
Ready to move? Take advantage of our Full Market Value Cash offer - get your home's market value from our expert agents.
1. Democratic Proposals for Housing Supply and Funding
Democrats emphasize government-led solutions for housing shortages, which include increasing the supply of affordable housing, investing in infrastructure, and providing direct federal aid. They propose to fund these initiatives by increasing taxes on corporations and high-income earners.
What Democrats Mean by "High-Income Earners"
High-income earners are generally defined as individuals or households making over $400,000 a year. This figure aligns with President Biden’s tax proposals, which aim to increase taxes on those earning above this threshold. Specific policies include:
Raising the top income tax rate from 37% to 39.6% for individuals earning over $400,000.
Implementing a capital gains tax hike for individuals earning more than $1 million annually, taxing long-term capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income.
Democrats' goal is to ensure that wealthier Americans contribute more toward funding federal initiatives like affordable housing projects, zoning reform incentives, and infrastructure improvements.
How the Money is Allocated
Direct Federal Investment: The Biden administration has proposed investing $100 billion in affordable housing as part of the American Jobs Plan, funding new affordable homes, rehabilitating existing public housing, and building more energy-efficient housing.
Corporate Tax Increases: Democrats also propose raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, generating revenue for public housing projects and infrastructure improvements essential for new housing developments.
2. Republican Proposals for Housing Supply and Funding
In contrast, Republicans emphasize private sector solutions. They propose reducing government spending and using tax incentives to spur private investment in housing development.
Funding through Deregulation and Tax Cuts
Republicans aim to reduce zoning regulations and streamline construction approval processes to lower the costs of building homes. They support tax credits for private developers who build affordable housing, believing that these free-market strategies will increase the housing supply without adding to the federal deficit.
Public-Private Partnerships:
Republicans advocate for public-private partnerships where private companies fund and manage infrastructure and housing developments, limiting the need for large federal expenditures. The Opportunity Zones Program is one such initiative that incentivizes investment in underdeveloped areas by offering tax breaks.
3. Impact on the National Debt
While Republicans prioritize tax cuts and private-sector solutions, Democrats’ plans rely on federal spending, which raises questions about its impact on the national debt.
Debt Implications of Democratic Proposals:
Increasing spending on affordable housing, infrastructure, and zoning reform would likely require significant federal resources. For example, the $100 billion proposal for affordable housing is part of a broader spending initiative under the American Jobs Plan, which could add $2 trillion to the national debt over the next decade if not fully offset by tax increases.
While tax hikes on high-income earners and corporations would generate revenue, analysts suggest that these measures would only partially cover the total cost of the proposed housing initiatives.
Example: According to the Tax Policy Center, Biden’s proposed tax changes are estimated to raise $3 trillion over 10 years. However, this revenue would also be used for other spending priorities such as healthcare and climate change, potentially leading to a shortfall in housing-specific funding.
Republican Concerns Over Increased Debt:
Republicans argue that the Democrats’ reliance on federal spending would increase the national debt, raising concerns about inflation and the sustainability of such programs in the long term. They believe that reducing regulations and allowing the private market to operate freely would be a more fiscally responsible approach to solving the housing crisis.
4. Comparison of Funding Approaches and Debt Impact
Party | Approach to Funding Housing Supply Initiatives | Impact on National Debt |
Democrats | Increase taxes on high-income earners and corporations | Likely to increase national debt due to high federal spending. Partial offset by tax revenue. |
Republicans | Private-sector solutions, deregulation, and tax incentives | Minimal impact on national debt; relies on private investment, not federal spending. |
Housing Supply, Taxes, and Debt in the 2024 Election
The housing supply crisis remains a crucial issue in the 2024 election, with both parties offering starkly different solutions. Democrats propose raising taxes on high-income earners and corporations to fund affordable housing, but this could add significantly to the national debt if their tax increases don’t fully cover the costs. On the other hand, Republicans advocate for private sector-driven development through deregulation, aiming to avoid adding to the federal deficit.
Voters will need to consider which approach aligns with their priorities: increased government intervention and spending with potential debt implications, or a reliance on the private sector with less direct government support for affordable housing.
How Builders, Real Estate Agents, and Developers Fit Into Housing Supply Initiatives
Builders, real estate agents, and developers play a crucial role in solving the housing supply crisis, which has become a major focus of the 2024 election. Both Republicans and Democrats propose different solutions to address the lack of housing, but the private sector—especially builders and developers—is central to making any plan a reality. Here’s how each group fits into the political strategies, along with insights into the challenges they face and the potential impact of government policies.
1. Builders: The Backbone of Housing Supply Expansion
Builders are directly responsible for constructing the new homes that both political parties hope will solve the housing supply crisis. However, they face numerous challenges that complicate their ability to meet demand.
Challenges Builders Face:
High interest rates: Nearly 90% of builders in 2023 cited high interest rates as a significant barrier, with the same concern expected to persist in 2024
National Association of Home Builders This increases the cost of financing projects and slows down construction.
Rising construction costs: Builders also face escalating material prices and labor shortages, which hinder their ability to build affordable housing
National Association of Home Builders
Policy Solutions:
Republican Proposals: Republicans focus on reducing regulatory burdens and streamlining zoning laws to help builders operate more efficiently. By cutting red tape, they aim to make it easier for builders to start new projects
Democratic Proposals: Democrats advocate for government incentives and expanded tax credits to encourage builders to prioritize affordable housing projects. They also support infrastructure investment to ensure new developments have access to essential services
National Association of Home Builders
2. Developers: Driving Growth Through Incentives
Developers work alongside builders to plan and finance new housing developments. They are particularly important in executing large-scale projects that can add significantly to the housing supply.
Opportunities for Developers:
Tax credits and incentives: Both parties offer different incentives to developers. For example, Democrats support expanding the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to encourage the development of affordable units
Meanwhile, Republicans favor Opportunity Zones, which provide tax breaks for developers investing in underdeveloped areas
National Association of Home Builders
Public-private partnerships: Developers may also benefit from public-private partnerships under Republican-led initiatives, where private investment is encouraged in exchange for tax incentives or long-term leases on government land
National Association of Home Builders
3. Real Estate Agents: Navigating a Competitive Market
Real estate agents are on the front lines of the housing market, helping buyers and sellers navigate a landscape shaped by supply shortages and fluctuating prices. They play a key role in connecting potential homeowners with new housing developments and affordable housing programs. Find your CPO Expert Agent here.
How Agents Are Affected:
Limited inventory: Agents face increased competition as housing inventory remains low, especially in high-demand markets like California and New York
National Association of Home Builders
The housing shortage has increased home prices, limiting options for buyers and driving up rents
First-time homebuyer programs: Real estate agents also help guide clients through first-time homebuyer programs that are often part of housing initiatives, such as the $15,000 tax credit proposed by Democrats
National Association of Home Builders
Quotes and Perspectives from Industry Leaders
Carl Harris, Chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), highlighted the critical role policymakers must play in easing regulations and providing incentives for builders: “This poll is a wake-up call for officials to act now. Builders need the right business climate to increase housing production and offer affordable solutions”
National Association of Home Builders
Chris Herbert, Managing Director at Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies, emphasized the need for concerted efforts: “With a nationwide shortage of 1.5 million housing units, efforts by builders to increase supply are crucial, but they need support from both government policies and private investment”
National Association of Home Builders
Conclusion: A Joint Effort Across Parties and Industries
Whether through regulatory reform or government incentives, builders, developers, and real estate agents are essential in solving the housing crisis. Both political parties propose policies aimed at boosting housing supply, but it’s clear that success depends on the private sector’s ability to overcome challenges like rising costs and regulatory barriers.
Sources:
National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) – 2024 Housing Platforms
National Association of Home Builders
Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies – State of the Nation's Housing Report /
National Housing Conference – Housing Affordability in the 2024 Election
Ready to sell? Get your Full Market Value Cash offer and skip the showings and any need to fix up your home.
Send your friends to: www.PoliticsInRealEstate.com
Ready to move? Take advantage of our Full Market Value Cash offer - get your home's market value from our expert agents.
This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Always consult with a professional for guidance specific to your circumstances.
This is from our series ‘Politics and Real Estate’
50 U.S. states, ranked by affordability, property and state income tax, and population changes from 2016 - 2024
Comments