Sep 236 min read

#17 Politics in Real Estate: How Climate Policy Impacts Housing Costs and Property Values

Updated: Sep 25

Climate policy plays an increasingly important role in shaping housing markets across the U.S. With the growing impact of climate change, areas prone to natural disasters such as wildfires, floods, and hurricanes are facing increasing scrutiny from both governments and real estate investors. As the U.S. heads toward the 2024 election, the policies of Democrats and Republicans regarding climate change have starkly different implications for property values, construction costs, and the overall housing market. Aggressive climate policies aimed at mitigating climate risks may make certain areas more expensive to build in, while properties in at-risk zones may see their values decline due to increasing environmental hazards.

Send your friends to: www.PoliticsInRealEstate.com

Ready to move? Take advantage of our Full Market Value Cash offer - get your home's market value from our expert agents.

1. How Climate Policy Affects Real Estate Markets

Climate policy impacts real estate in multiple ways. Aggressive climate regulations, which require stricter building codes or limit development in areas prone to environmental risk, can increase construction costs and make housing more expensive. Conversely, areas that fail to adopt climate adaptation measures may become less desirable due to growing risks, such as floods, wildfires, or rising sea levels, resulting in declining property values.

Key Effects of Climate Policy on Housing:

Increased Building Costs: Stricter building codes designed to improve climate resilience, such as requirements for flood-proofing or fire-resistant materials, can raise the cost of construction. Developers must account for these additional costs, which can make new housing more expensive, particularly in states like California and Florida.
Declining Property Values in Risk Areas: Properties in areas vulnerable to climate change—like coastal cities at risk of flooding or drought-prone regions—can see significant declines in value as insurers, buyers, and developers become wary of the risks.

Example:

In Miami, rising sea levels are becoming a major concern for real estate investors and homeowners alike. Coastal properties, once considered highly desirable, are now facing declining property values as flood risks increase. Homeowners are also seeing rising insurance premiums, further discouraging investment in these at-risk areas.

2. Democratic and Republican Approaches to Climate Policy

Democratic Approach:

The Democratic Party generally advocates for aggressive climate action to mitigate the effects of climate change. Their policies focus on reducing carbon emissions, transitioning to renewable energy, and strengthening infrastructure to better withstand environmental threats. Democrats believe that without such action, the economic damage from climate change, including the decline in property values in at-risk areas, will outweigh the costs of implementing climate regulations.

Climate Resilience and Infrastructure: Democrats push for investment in climate-resilient infrastructure, including flood barriers, wildfire prevention measures, and sustainable urban development. These policies aim to protect communities from future environmental risks while supporting growth in safer areas.
Green Building Codes: Democrats often call for stricter building codes that require homes to be built with energy-efficient materials and disaster-resistant features. While this increases upfront costs, they argue that the long-term savings in energy and maintenance make it worthwhile.

Examples:

California: With its history of wildfires and environmental policies, California is a key example of Democratic-led climate action. The state's aggressive climate regulations—such as limiting development in wildfire-prone areas and enforcing fire-resistant building codes—have driven up housing costs but also improved long-term safety and sustainability.
New York City: New York’s Local Law 97, part of its Climate Mobilization Act, requires large buildings to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030. While this has increased renovation and building costs, it also sets the city on a path toward climate resilience, ensuring long-term property value protection in the face of environmental threats.

Republican Approach:

The Republican Party is more cautious when it comes to climate policy, focusing on economic growth and property rights. Republicans often argue that aggressive climate regulations can stifle development, increase housing costs, and reduce the availability of affordable homes. They favor more market-driven solutions, such as encouraging private-sector innovation in green technology rather than imposing government mandates.

Economic Priorities: Republicans typically prioritize economic growth over environmental regulation. They argue that less regulation and lower building costs are better for the housing market and that the private sector is best equipped to adapt to climate-related risks.
Property Rights and Development: Republicans also emphasize the importance of property rights and limiting government restrictions on where and how land can be developed. In states like Texas, they have resisted restrictive environmental laws that could drive up the cost of construction and reduce housing supply.

Examples:

Florida: Florida, under Republican leadership, has been less aggressive in implementing statewide climate regulations, despite the state's vulnerability to hurricanes and rising sea levels. While developers and homeowners in coastal areas are increasingly aware of the risks, the state government has focused on encouraging private-sector solutions to these issues.
Texas: In Houston, Republican leaders have resisted calls for stricter flood-zone regulations after repeated hurricanes and floods. Instead, they have favored policies that promote rapid rebuilding and lower construction costs, helping keep housing prices stable, though concerns about long-term climate impacts remain.

3. City Examples of Climate Policy and Housing Impact

Miami, Florida:

Miami’s real estate market is being heavily impacted by the threat of rising sea levels. Despite Florida’s relatively lax climate regulations, flood-prone areas are already seeing declines in property values as buyers and investors shy away from high-risk coastal properties. However, Miami’s luxury market remains strong in safer, inland areas that are less vulnerable to climate change.

San Francisco, California:

San Francisco faces a dual threat of rising sea levels and wildfire risks in surrounding areas. California’s stringent climate regulations require developers to adhere to tough environmental standards, raising construction costs but also reducing the long-term risk to properties from climate change.

Houston, Texas:

After repeated flooding from hurricanes, Houston's housing market continues to expand, but developers face increasing pressure to address flood risks. While the state has not enforced significant climate-related building codes, the real estate market is adapting by moving development away from flood zones and raising homes in at-risk areas.

New York City, New York:

New York’s coastal areas are also feeling the effects of rising sea levels. In response, the city has enacted a series of climate policies aimed at making buildings more energy-efficient and flood-resistant. However, the cost of complying with these regulations has increased renovation expenses, particularly for older buildings.

4. Broader Implications for the Real Estate Market

As climate change intensifies, the housing market must adapt to both the physical risks of environmental disasters and the economic impact of climate regulations. Areas that adopt aggressive climate policies may see increased construction costs but benefit from long-term safety and property value protection. Conversely, regions that fail to address climate risks may face declining property values as insurance companies raise premiums and buyers become wary of investing in high-risk areas.

Climate Policy and the 2024 Election

As the 2024 election approaches, climate policy will remain a critical factor in shaping the future of housing markets. Democrats advocate for aggressive climate action to ensure long-term sustainability and protect property values in vulnerable areas. Republicans, on the other hand, argue that reducing climate regulations will keep housing affordable and stimulate economic growth. The outcome of the election will have profound implications for real estate markets, especially in areas at high risk from climate change.

Disclaimer:

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice. Climate policies and their effects on housing markets vary by location and individual circumstances. Always consult with real estate professionals to understand how climate policies may affect your property or investment.